<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 or Department 2.0?  Discuss.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/03/26/e2ord2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/03/26/e2ord2/</link>
	<description>Your path to success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:53:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for Enterprise 2.0 or Department 2.0? Discuss. &#124; Gil Yehuda's Enterprise 2.0 Blog [gilyehuda.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/03/26/e2ord2/comment-page-1/#comment-1953</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Enterprise 2.0 or Department 2.0? Discuss. &#124; Gil Yehuda's Enterprise 2.0 Blog [gilyehuda.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilyehuda.com/?p=218#comment-1953</guid>
		<description>[...] link is being shared on Twitter right now. @gyehuda, an influential author, said RT @tweetmeme [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] link is being shared on Twitter right now. @gyehuda, an influential author, said RT @tweetmeme [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ardire</title>
		<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/03/26/e2ord2/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ardire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilyehuda.com/?p=218#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Hi Gil - you&#039;ve nicely described the &#039;trials and tribulations&#039; of E2.0 social computing players.  Having an enterprise wiki deployed makes it more interesting if you know how to leverage ;)

read Mike Gotta&#039;s ( Burton Group ) Field Research Study: Social Networking Within the Enterprise. It&#039;s a free download here http://snurl.com/f2x88 .

Conclusion: Many organizations have yet to make an enterprise-wide decision on social networking technology. Even in those that have, most projects are in proof-of-concept or early stages of deployment. Burton Group also concludes that organizations are struggling with many non-technology issues within social networking initiatives (e.g., business case, metrics, policies and controls, roles and responsibilities, employee participation models, and cultural dynamics).

So if you win a one of the  3 short list positions for Dept 2.0 &#039;bake off&#039; congrats ...you&#039;re one step closer to an E2.0 deployment. 

And if you feel confident  you&#039;ve got the inside pole position peg it so you can ensure victory and  scale to an Enterprise 2.0 deployment  !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gil &#8211; you&#8217;ve nicely described the &#8216;trials and tribulations&#8217; of E2.0 social computing players.  Having an enterprise wiki deployed makes it more interesting if you know how to leverage <img src='http://www.gilyehuda.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>read Mike Gotta&#8217;s ( Burton Group ) Field Research Study: Social Networking Within the Enterprise. It&#8217;s a free download here <a href="http://snurl.com/f2x88" rel="nofollow">http://snurl.com/f2x88</a> .</p>
<p>Conclusion: Many organizations have yet to make an enterprise-wide decision on social networking technology. Even in those that have, most projects are in proof-of-concept or early stages of deployment. Burton Group also concludes that organizations are struggling with many non-technology issues within social networking initiatives (e.g., business case, metrics, policies and controls, roles and responsibilities, employee participation models, and cultural dynamics).</p>
<p>So if you win a one of the  3 short list positions for Dept 2.0 &#8216;bake off&#8217; congrats &#8230;you&#8217;re one step closer to an E2.0 deployment. </p>
<p>And if you feel confident  you&#8217;ve got the inside pole position peg it so you can ensure victory and  scale to an Enterprise 2.0 deployment  !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library clips :: Are you really doing Enterprise 2.0? :: November :: 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/03/26/e2ord2/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: Are you really doing Enterprise 2.0? :: November :: 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilyehuda.com/?p=218#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...] [ADDED 05/04/09: Enterprise 2.0 or Department 2.0? Discuss] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [ADDED 05/04/09: Enterprise 2.0 or Department 2.0? Discuss] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
