<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 Thoughts to end the week.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/05/15/week-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/05/15/week-review/</link>
	<description>A blog about collaboration, trust, open source, workplace, and community behaviors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:19:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijeesh</title>
		<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/05/15/week-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4531</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijeesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilyehuda.com/?p=384#comment-4531</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @gyehuda Enterprise 2.0 Thoughts to end the week. http://bit.ly/JqTmu Nice article!!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @gyehuda Enterprise 2.0 Thoughts to end the week. <a href="http://bit.ly/JqTmu" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/JqTmu</a> Nice article!!</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-05-24 &#124; Brian Magierski</title>
		<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/05/15/week-review/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-05-24 &#124; Brian Magierski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 23:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilyehuda.com/?p=384#comment-685</guid>
		<description>[...] Enterprise 2.0 Thoughts to end the week. (tags: enterprise2.0 Adoption e2.0)     Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Enterprise 2.0 Thoughts to end the week. (tags: enterprise2.0 Adoption e2.0)     Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Yehuda</title>
		<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/05/15/week-review/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Yehuda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilyehuda.com/?p=384#comment-680</guid>
		<description>@Greg Thanks. And I love it when you talk McAfee and Demings to me :-)

@Jerome nice tool and seems quite easy to use, especially for non-work social collaboration (family messages overseas).  I suggest talking to some of your clients who use the tool, and really understand what their pain points are with their process.  You might find that small enhancements make a big difference to them.

@Karen  Thanks for pointing this out to us.  I encourage my readers to read your blog post you linked.  It&#039;s important to experiment and find how tools meet their needs (which differ from client to client). 

@Tom the difference between #2 and #1 is huge.  We call it Enterprise 2.0, but many find success limited to Department 2.0.  It&#039;s fine for a while, but there are many real challenges too.  I&#039;ve blogged about this issue here http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/03/26/e2ord2/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Greg Thanks. And I love it when you talk McAfee and Demings to me <img src='http://www.gilyehuda.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Jerome nice tool and seems quite easy to use, especially for non-work social collaboration (family messages overseas).  I suggest talking to some of your clients who use the tool, and really understand what their pain points are with their process.  You might find that small enhancements make a big difference to them.</p>
<p>@Karen  Thanks for pointing this out to us.  I encourage my readers to read your blog post you linked.  It&#8217;s important to experiment and find how tools meet their needs (which differ from client to client). </p>
<p>@Tom the difference between #2 and #1 is huge.  We call it Enterprise 2.0, but many find success limited to Department 2.0.  It&#8217;s fine for a while, but there are many real challenges too.  I&#8217;ve blogged about this issue here <a href="http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/03/26/e2ord2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/03/26/e2ord2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

