<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innovation Pilgrimage (2 of 2).</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/05/22/innovation-pilgrimage-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/05/22/innovation-pilgrimage-two/</link>
	<description>Your path to success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Yehuda</title>
		<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/05/22/innovation-pilgrimage-two/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Yehuda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilyehuda.com/?p=399#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Steve, I&#039;m not going to be able to summarize the market in a comment.  Perhaps some of the vendors might choose to add information here to help.   At a very simplistic level, there are &quot;front-end&quot; processes of capture and refinement and &quot;back-end&quot; or stage-gate processes that support implementation.  In addition to capture and vote (which you can do with a decent forum server), some have features that aid in dealing with duplication of ideas, or with getting additional information that help qualify an idea, etc.  And there&#039;s more.

Keep watch of this blog, I may be spending more time talking about innovation in the coming months.  And then I&#039;ll be able to dive deeper into this topic.

Readers -- would you want to see this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I&#8217;m not going to be able to summarize the market in a comment.  Perhaps some of the vendors might choose to add information here to help.   At a very simplistic level, there are &#8220;front-end&#8221; processes of capture and refinement and &#8220;back-end&#8221; or stage-gate processes that support implementation.  In addition to capture and vote (which you can do with a decent forum server), some have features that aid in dealing with duplication of ideas, or with getting additional information that help qualify an idea, etc.  And there&#8217;s more.</p>
<p>Keep watch of this blog, I may be spending more time talking about innovation in the coming months.  And then I&#8217;ll be able to dive deeper into this topic.</p>
<p>Readers &#8212; would you want to see this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Boese</title>
		<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/05/22/innovation-pilgrimage-two/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Boese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilyehuda.com/?p=399#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Gil, I really enjoyed the post, particularly the comparisons between innovation, KM, and E2.0.  When you talk about the &#039;innovation&#039; vendors, what functionality do these solutions typically provide, beyond ways to capture ideas and suggestions and a way to vote or rate them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gil, I really enjoyed the post, particularly the comparisons between innovation, KM, and E2.0.  When you talk about the &#8216;innovation&#8217; vendors, what functionality do these solutions typically provide, beyond ways to capture ideas and suggestions and a way to vote or rate them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
