Lessons from New York Smokers.

by Gil Yehuda on June 16, 2009

in Enterprise 2.0


I just spend this morning in Manhattan giving a workshop on Enterprise 2.0 and Workplace Video along with Livio Hughes of Headshift and Linda Orton of Intelligent Video Solutions. An upcoming post will be about the workshop itself. This post is just about my impressions of walking around downtown Manhattan and that it reminded me when I first learned about Enterprise 2.0 concepts 20 years ago.

Manhattan is more than a location; it’s an environment with a vibe, an energy with its own personality. Much like the ocean wave is more than a large collection of moving water drops, people hustling up and down the streets form a great human mass of constant motion and energy. It is stochastic and chaotic. Some people walk in pairs or small groups talking to each other as they meander slowly. Many walk solo, with some fixed destination in mind. The solo walkers find their own pace, but seem to be encumbered by the groups.

But then there was the smoking. I’m not a smoker. Never was, never will be. But many of the people who walked ahead of me during my short trip to Manhattan were smokers. I didn’t care for it. But it reminded me of one of the most important workplace lessons I learned about 20 years ago.

I was just finished with college and worked at Xerox Corporation in Webster, NY. I was a knowledge engineer – which was a fancy term they used for someone involved in their Knowledge Based Systems group. The KBS center was formed to unite the best thinking in Knowledge Management techniques with the world of Artificial Intelligence. Unofficially, our group was set up to compete with Xerox PARC. Some in management were upset that PARC invented technology that Xerox failed to capitalize on, and they wanted an alternative think-tank in the company that would target more tactical issues that the business faced – like supply chain management, inventory planning, sales territory configuration, and other mundane business needs.

I worked on a small team with other young technical folks and we build systems for the business. There was on guy on the team who was a smoker, Eric.  About five or six times a day he’d take his break, and puff smoke into the otherwise pleasant air that came off nearby Lake Ontario. Eric was not the lead developer, though he was very skilled. He was always more informed than anyone else. When someone had a question, he’d know about someone in some other group that we could ask and get help. The reason he was so well connected was simple: he was a smoker. Smokers developed an informal employee social network. They spent nearly an hour a day chatting with other smokers in other groups about all sorts of shared interests. Eric was pretty junior, but he hung out with some of the more senior managers too – those who smoked, that is. Eric knew about people and initiatives that we never heard of. He was our eyes and ears, and was invaluable to the team.

It occurred to me then that workplaces need social networks. At that time, our notion of social networks was more like a discussion newsgroup. We did not have profile tools and follow-lists. But we did have on-line communities. And it seemed obvious to me that either HR needed to get everyone to smoke, or we needed some other way to get people to learn about their work environment in a stochastic, social manner. Since getting us to smoke would drive our health insurance costs up, I figured that online workplace communities will be a must-have for large organizations.

Companies set up all-hands meetings, corporate softball teams, weekend charity projects, and many other event structures that are designed, in part, to get people to “gel” together. This is solid business thinking too. Organizations want people to work together effectively. In fact, a recent private study conducted by a colleague of mine in the health-care industry found that the most important element to preventing a particular type of accidental death in a hospital setting is tied directly to how effectively the floor-staff has gelled. The better they are as a team, the higher the likelihood that someone will notice and correct a common procedural mistake that one of their co-nurses made. The hospitals who commissioned this study are now trying to figure out how to get their floor staff to feel like a team. Who would have thought that a weekly pizza lunch and a bulletin board with family pictures could save lives?

I don’t care for smoking. And I’m happy with the quality of life in my quite suburb outside of Boston. But walking in the smoke-filled energetic streets of the big city reminded me about the lesson of breaking corporate tribalism and getting to know people from different ranks and files of the organization. Enterprise 2.0 types of online social networks make this gelling easier, especially when you work in multiple locations. And it’s smoke free.

5 Other Comments

{ 3 trackbacks }

What Sets Your Law Firm Apart? | Above and Beyond KM
June 16, 2009 at 11:11 pm
2.0. Law. Firm? Not.
June 21, 2009 at 12:04 am
„Ist Social Media eine neue Form der Zigarettenpause?“ auf karrierebibel.de – Jeden Tag mehr Erfolg!
September 9, 2009 at 4:58 am

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Priyanka D June 17, 2009 at 1:43 am

I agree gelling is very important for good work to happen, and also for innovation. Relaxed environments can lead to really good ideas!

Reply   More from author

2 rich r June 20, 2009 at 9:35 am

These Twitter sourced comments give me a headache from their brevity. (There I said it. In under 140 characters.)

Reply   More from author

3 Dina July 1, 2009 at 10:19 pm

I really enjoyed this post! I’m the same as you, never smoked and never will, but definitely have been a little ‘jealous’ at times of the connections that have been formed during smoke breaks. So much once that during a particularly dramatic & ‘exciting’ time at a company I used to work at, I started going out with the smokers on their breaks just so that I could keep up on the gossip. I just stood upwind :)

The comparison makes perfect sense, these are the networks we need to strengthen using Ent 2.0 social networks!

Reply   More from author

4 grl September 3, 2009 at 4:47 am

Bill — An interesting post and topic! I think there’s likely an interesting history (and sociological studies) of how informal groups form and cross-link in businesses and other organizations.

The most interesting groups seem to be cross-functional and distributed – with some difficulty before the Web and email, with less difficulty now.

A few examples:

1) Watercooler – physically collocated, somewhat cross-functional (but often cube neighbors)

2) Smokers – physically collocated, cross-functional and cross-hierarchical

3) IT Tech support, Admin Assistants – folk who talk a lot with a wide variety of others in the enterprise, and have their own network or grapevine of contacts with their peers.

4) The NCO / Chiefs network – Anyone in the military knows that NCOs (Sergeants and Chief Petty Officers) use an informal network of local – and globe spanning – contacts who know what’s up and how to make something happen. This probably dates to Roman times if not before.

With the advent of cheap and ubiquitous Web technology, it has become easier for networks to form, keep in contact, and scale beyond previous limits of space and number of participants.

Is there a Doctor of Sociology in the house with a few good references?

A few of my notes with links on

Connections & McAfee Bullseye model of strong, weak, potential ties
http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Blog640

Twitter: world’s largest floating cocktail party, coffee break, and trade show happy hour
http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Blog1014

This comment was originally posted on Portals and KM

Reply   More from author

5 Jason M. Lemkin September 3, 2009 at 7:17 pm

LOL

This comment was originally posted on Portals and KM

Reply   More from author

6 bill Ives September 8, 2009 at 4:24 pm

grl and jason Thanks for your long and short comment. I liked the NCO network reference.

This comment was originally posted on Portals and KM

Reply   More from author

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Additional comments powered by BackType

Previous post:

Next post: