<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessons from &#8220;Why Software Sucks&#8221; about terminology.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/07/17/lessons-from-why-software-sucks-about-terminology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/07/17/lessons-from-why-software-sucks-about-terminology/</link>
	<description>A blog about collaboration, trust, open source, workplace, and community behaviors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:19:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ist E 2.0 ein Thema fuer IT-Architekten? &#171; Enterprise2Punkt0 Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/07/17/lessons-from-why-software-sucks-about-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-3264</link>
		<dc:creator>Ist E 2.0 ein Thema fuer IT-Architekten? &#171; Enterprise2Punkt0 Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilyehuda.com/?p=543#comment-3264</guid>
		<description>[...] Portaltechnologie, Ajax, Rest, Soap, LDAP &#8211; 2.0 hat auch irgendwo technische Auswirkungen und Voraussetzungen, klar.Aber ist Enterprise 2.0 ein Thema fuer IT-Architekten? Oder, anders formuliert: Software sucks&#8230;  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Portaltechnologie, Ajax, Rest, Soap, LDAP &#8211; 2.0 hat auch irgendwo technische Auswirkungen und Voraussetzungen, klar.Aber ist Enterprise 2.0 ein Thema fuer IT-Architekten? Oder, anders formuliert: Software sucks&#8230;  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicky </title>
		<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/07/17/lessons-from-why-software-sucks-about-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-4872</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicky </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilyehuda.com/?p=543#comment-4872</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Reading @gyehuda&#039;s post on e2.0 client adoption http://bit.ly/10NiNC (I think it starts with reasonable returns vs transformation in action)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Reading @gyehuda&#8217;s post on e2.0 client adoption <a href="http://bit.ly/10NiNC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/10NiNC</a> (I think it starts with reasonable returns vs transformation in action)</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Yehuda</title>
		<link>http://www.gilyehuda.com/2009/07/17/lessons-from-why-software-sucks-about-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-4873</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Yehuda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilyehuda.com/?p=543#comment-4873</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;There are some really good comments posted on my last blog post. Thanks folks!  http://bit.ly/15UmE6&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">There are some really good comments posted on my last blog post. Thanks folks!  <a href="http://bit.ly/15UmE6" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/15UmE6</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

