Briefings (Part 1): What they are, why they are important.

by Gil Yehuda on March 17, 2010

in Enterprise 2.0


This is going to be a two part post. In part 1, I’m going to talk about the notion of an analyst briefing and why they are important. In part 2, I’m going to mention some companies that briefed me, but I had neglected to write about them.

With this two parter, I bring closure to one element of my blogging activities this past year – where I mention interesting vendors who have briefed me about their products. Since I’m no longer an analyst for hire, I’m not going to be taking analyst briefings. So I’m not going to be writing about other vendors in any formal sense. Sure, I’ll continue to meet many people and I enjoy networking in my industry. But briefings are on hold for now.

What is an analyst briefing?

Briefings are one of the important ways analyst get information. The set-up is a very clever win-win dance that allows us to get information before you do. This helps make us appear to be smart. Here’s how they work: a CEO or CMO meets with the analyst for about an hour and shares their story: e.g. the product vision, company aspiration, and successes stories. Briefings are usually arranged by AR folks – Analyst Relations (Simplistically put: PR folks who are attuned to the peculiarities of the analyst community. Realistically it bit more than that.) Large companies employ AR directly; smaller ones retain the services via a PR/AR firm. Sometimes an analyst requests a briefing (to prepare for a report of a client who indicated they are interested in a particular vendor). Most times, AR folks contact us hoping to keep us up to date with their latest news.

Briefings enable analysts to meet important people and to get tons of information they need for their clients and reports. There are formal and informal rules of the trade when it comes to information disclosure. CEOs are very candid. Analysts can ask probing questions, and don’t have to give any advice – but we typically do. CEOs want to be on our radar. They might get free advice, free press on our blogs and reports, and free introductions to our clients. There are various levels of maturity in the relationship that an analyst can forge with a CEO or CMO at a briefing. Sometimes it’s a boring flip through slides where CMOs claim to be “world class provider” of something and the analyst will say (or think) something snarky about the emptiness of that claim. Sometimes the briefings foster a strong connection, with joint business opportunities that result. The very best AR folks are strategic about who and how they manage their matchmaking. AR is a quite an art, and although analysts don’t make money directly this way, it’s really important for us to stay on top of the news – even before it happens.

Briefings are also a way to measure our perceived relevance. If everyone wants to brief you, that means that the AR community sees you as an important and influential voice. Briefings take time to set up, and involve the most senior people the vendor has available.

When I started off on my own last year, I was concerned was that once I was no longer employed by a well-known analyst firm, I’d ignored by the AR community. With only one exception (which I later learned was an oversight), A/R folks returned all my calls and were reaching out to me as much as before, or more. In irony, I discovered that my traffic and relevance to my audience increased dramatically after my Forrester days. Great for me; not such a good omen for the model of a traditional analyst firm. Having a healthy personal blog was a big reason for this virtuous cycle.

Important note: My blog policy states getting briefed does not guarantee a blog post. This was for both practical as well as principle issues. Practically speaking: briefing is a service that is rendered on an honor system. No quid pro quo. Money is not passed – I don’t charge to be briefed, I don’t pay to be briefed. So no guarantees. Moreover, sometimes I was too busy to blog. Or I was totally unimpressed, and did not want to write a negative blog only to invite defensive comments by the company who would then accuse me of not understanding their message. I’d rather tell them privately what things to work on before someone like me would have something positive to say. This was far more my style than being a snarky blogger. Moreover, if I blogged every briefing, I’d have every AR/PR person calling to get free press for her client. It would cheapen this blog too.

There is also a principle: good analysts are not vendor shills. Just ‘cuz vendors think they have a great idea does not mean we think they do. I might know that their competitor is about to release something even better next week – so why blog small news when I could wait and blog something better. But, A/R folks knew that if I found something really interesting, I’d share my clients (some of whom hired me to help them select products), and maybe posted something on this blog. Moreover they would get a good amount of feedback from me – which would help them out. Sometimes we even converted the conversation to business.

If you have been reading me here, you’ll know that I covered many vendors (search for blog posts tagged with “tool” or “vendor”). These were results from great briefings.  And I appreciated them.  But many vendors briefed me and did not get mentioned here. In the next post, I’m going to correct my omission my mentioning some of the companies that should have been covered here in the past.  In the meantime, now you know a little secret about analysts.  We know stuff ‘cuz important people tell us stuff.  They tell us stuff ‘cuz it’s in their best interest to.

{ 1 trackback }

uberVU - social comments
March 18, 2010 at 1:42 am

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Jacob Morgan March 18, 2010 at 3:28 pm

great post from @gyehuda on analyst briefings, http://bit.ly/bhY504

Reply

2 Ronna Porter March 18, 2010 at 7:58 am

Analyst briefings: what they are, and why they are important (part 1) http://ow.ly/16Pwk8 / source @gyehuda #e20 #in

Reply

3 Robert Lavigne March 18, 2010 at 6:17 am

Blog post #e20 Briefings (Part 1): What they are, why they are important. http://ow.ly/16Pwk8 (via @gyehuda)

Reply

4 Oscar Berg March 18, 2010 at 5:37 am

Blog post #e20 Briefings (Part 1): What they are, why they are important. http://ow.ly/16Pwk8 /via @gyehuda > interesting

Reply

5 Jeff Wilfong March 18, 2010 at 5:24 am

RT @gyehuda: Blog post #e20 Briefings (Part 1): What they are, why they are important. http://ow.ly/16Pwk8

Reply

6 Sameer Patel March 18, 2010 at 4:20 am

Gil's "Kitchen Confidential" version of the Analyst Business. Cool > RT @gyehuda: Blog post: Briefings. http://ow.ly/16Pwk8

Reply

7 Gil Yehuda March 18, 2010 at 1:16 am

Blog post #e20 Briefings (Part 1): What they are, why they are important. http://ow.ly/16Pwk8

Reply

8 Richard Harbridge March 17, 2010 at 5:41 pm

Analyst Briefings Part 1 – http://is.gd/aMaka {Interesting to learn more about how this works.}

Reply

9 Susan Scrupski March 17, 2010 at 5:18 pm

I like you in this position. (Well, I liked you before, but emphasize the “in this position.”) I’d like to hear you post on how influence is changing in this market. Case in point– moi. My blog barely registers on a z-list of bloggers. I probably don’t have enough page views in my entire archive to measure the “attention” other bloggers have even in e20.

That said, do I have influence?

To quote Sarah, “You betcha.” Every minute of every 24-hour day I have the opportunity to give my opinion/feed relevant information to our members. It surprises me that more vendors in this sector don’t see me as an analyst. Guaranteed– discussions in the Council affect major buying decisions in our sector as well as “brand reputation” of many of the vendors who are trying to curry analyst favor. I’m not even talking about the current working analysts’ understanding of our sector, that is a matter altogether and one where I feel comfortable I can hold my own. I’m not complaining about this, as I feel fairly strongly the traditional analyst model is antiquated and will have to change over the next few years. One of our members (who used to be an analyst) told me yesterday it will begin to happen in the next year… .09% probability. :-)

Reply

10 Gil Yehuda March 17, 2010 at 6:27 pm

Susan, ahem, I’m glad you like me in this, ahem, position (sigh)! It’s good for me too! Kidding aside, Susan, you rock! I’ll always pay attention to what you are doing.

I plan to post about the myths of personal branding and online influence. I think that the socially mediated world of blogs and tweets has changed the perception of influence, but maybe not the reality as much. We have such myopia that it’s hard to see where real influence is. I have taken lots of rambling notes on this topic and plan to share them. But I have to formulate my thoughts into more coherent posts. But it is in the works.

I happen to agree that the analyst model is going to face a huge challenge. It’s actually very similar to the challenge that software faces in light of free and open source options. “Good enough” options that are cheap or free cause commoditization in the marketplace, which drives prices down and changes the nature of what you are really purchasing. Some people will opt to surf for free advice, others will pay for it. But to touch back to the blog post above — I’ll tell you that I got about the same quality and quantity of briefings two years ago when I was a Forrester analyst charging the going rate for my time, as I got last year when I was on my own and charging a more competitive rate. And I got about the same level of customer engagement too. I just didn’t have quantitative survey data (on surveys that did not ask the questions I wanted them to ask anyway). It was good enough for my clients. So people like me commoditized the market for those customers who wanted the same guy at a better price. And I was not the one to choose this route – they chose it for me, so I offer no apology for it. Of course, many people will continue to seek the analyst firms too — as they offer things that boutiques cannot (wider variety of coverage areas, events, a fancy name etc.) . I don’t predict they will go hungry. Brilliant people run these firms. But their actions in trying to keep closed and proprietary are creating a space for others to eat some of their market share. And I appreciate their generosity in this regard. It helped me grow my influence and sustain my family in a very challenging economy.

Reply

11 Wissensauslese March 17, 2010 at 3:24 pm

#gilyehuda Briefings (Part 1): What they are, why they are important. http://bit.ly/b1qJHh #e20

Reply

12 Abbe @SamePagewiki March 17, 2010 at 11:22 am

This is useful, Gil. You are open about the process in a way most analysts are not. From my perspective, as an analyst out on your own, there were less barriers to reaching you. With your online presence, you made it clear where your focus was and that you had a strong following. You were more accessible and companies responded in kind – or vice versa. It’s been a pleasure working with you.

Reply

13 Gil Yehuda March 17, 2010 at 1:17 pm

Thanks Abbe. You’ll be pleased to note that part 2 begins with my thoughts on SamePageWiki. Indeed I had you in mind when I composed this two-part blog.

Reply

14 Abbe @samepagewiki March 19, 2010 at 2:57 pm

We appreciate that and look forward to reading more from you.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: